2.1 Popular Structured Frameworks:

There are several schools of thought and methodologies for solving case interviews. Each has its own approach, tools, and techniques. Here are some of the most prominent ones:

  • Victor Cheng's Frameworks:

    • Business Situation Framework: Used to identify the core issues in business problems by breaking them down into four categories: customers, products, company, and competition.

    • Profitability Framework: Focuses on diagnosing profitability issues by analyzing revenue streams and cost structures.

    • M&A Framework: Evaluates mergers and acquisitions by assessing the potential synergies and strategic fit between the companies involved.

  • Case in Point by Marc Cosentino:

    • 12 Case Scenarios: Provides specific frameworks for different types of cases such as market-sizing, entering a new market, mergers and acquisitions, pricing, growth strategies, etc.

    • Ivy Case System: A step-by-step approach to structuring and solving case interviews, emphasizing hypothesis-driven thinking and structured problem-solving.

  • McKinsey Problem-Solving Approach:

    • MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive): Ensures that all aspects of a problem are covered without any overlap.

    • Decision Tree: Breaks down the problem into smaller, manageable parts to systematically address each aspect.

    • Hypothesis-Driven Approach: Starts with a hypothesis and uses data and analysis to validate or refine it.

  • BCG's Hypothesis-Driven Approach:

    • Focus on Key Drivers: Identifies the most important factors influencing the problem.

    • Iterative Process: Continuously refines the hypothesis based on data and insights.

    • Analytical Rigor: Uses detailed data analysis to support conclusions and recommendations.

  • Bain's Approach to Case Interviews:

    • Structured Frameworks: Uses specific frameworks tailored to common case types such as profitability, market entry, growth strategy, etc.

    • Practical and Real-World Focus: Emphasizes practical solutions and real-world business experience.

    • Collaborative Style: Encourages a collaborative problem-solving approach, similar to working with a client.

  • The Pyramid Principle by Barbara Minto:

    • Top-Down Communication: Structures information in a pyramid format, starting with the main conclusion and supporting it with arguments and data.

    • Clarity and Conciseness: Focuses on clear and concise communication of ideas and solutions.

  • Other:

    • Case Competitions and Academic Approaches: Often use a combination of frameworks and emphasize creativity, presentation skills, and teamwork.

    • Industry-Specific Frameworks:

      • Healthcare Cases: Focus on regulatory environment, patient outcomes, and cost structures.

      • Technology Cases: Emphasize innovation, scalability, and competitive landscape.

      • Retail Cases: Focus on consumer behavior, supply chain management, and pricing strategies.

2.1 Popular Structured Frameworks:

There are several schools of thought and methodologies for solving case interviews. Each has its own approach, tools, and techniques. Here are some of the most prominent ones:

  • Victor Cheng's Frameworks:

    • Business Situation Framework: Used to identify the core issues in business problems by breaking them down into four categories: customers, products, company, and competition.

    • Profitability Framework: Focuses on diagnosing profitability issues by analyzing revenue streams and cost structures.

    • M&A Framework: Evaluates mergers and acquisitions by assessing the potential synergies and strategic fit between the companies involved.

  • Case in Point by Marc Cosentino:

    • 12 Case Scenarios: Provides specific frameworks for different types of cases such as market-sizing, entering a new market, mergers and acquisitions, pricing, growth strategies, etc.

    • Ivy Case System: A step-by-step approach to structuring and solving case interviews, emphasizing hypothesis-driven thinking and structured problem-solving.

  • McKinsey Problem-Solving Approach:

    • MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive): Ensures that all aspects of a problem are covered without any overlap.

    • Decision Tree: Breaks down the problem into smaller, manageable parts to systematically address each aspect.

    • Hypothesis-Driven Approach: Starts with a hypothesis and uses data and analysis to validate or refine it.

  • BCG's Hypothesis-Driven Approach:

    • Focus on Key Drivers: Identifies the most important factors influencing the problem.

    • Iterative Process: Continuously refines the hypothesis based on data and insights.

    • Analytical Rigor: Uses detailed data analysis to support conclusions and recommendations.

  • Bain's Approach to Case Interviews:

    • Structured Frameworks: Uses specific frameworks tailored to common case types such as profitability, market entry, growth strategy, etc.

    • Practical and Real-World Focus: Emphasizes practical solutions and real-world business experience.

    • Collaborative Style: Encourages a collaborative problem-solving approach, similar to working with a client.

  • The Pyramid Principle by Barbara Minto:

    • Top-Down Communication: Structures information in a pyramid format, starting with the main conclusion and supporting it with arguments and data.

    • Clarity and Conciseness: Focuses on clear and concise communication of ideas and solutions.

  • Other:

    • Case Competitions and Academic Approaches: Often use a combination of frameworks and emphasize creativity, presentation skills, and teamwork.

    • Industry-Specific Frameworks:

      • Healthcare Cases: Focus on regulatory environment, patient outcomes, and cost structures.

      • Technology Cases: Emphasize innovation, scalability, and competitive landscape.

      • Retail Cases: Focus on consumer behavior, supply chain management, and pricing strategies.